rockerest’s avatarrockerest’s Twitter Archive—№ 9,646

      1. …in reply to @kenhowardpdx
        kenhowardpdx Not your target audience here, but I find the "ESNext" nomenclature to refer to "anything not yet standardized" a bit wierd
    1. …in reply to @rockerest
      kenhowardpdx Same - to a stronger degree - with ES6+. ES6 was 2015, should I use ES6+ to refer to ES2016 features (fully standard now)?
  1. …in reply to @rockerest
    kenhowardpdx Honestly, I think we should *only* have: JavaScript, or ESNext. The former is fully standard features, the latter is proposals