-
…in reply to @kenhowardpdx
kenhowardpdx Not your target audience here, but I find the "ESNext" nomenclature to refer to "anything not yet standardized" a bit wierd
-
…in reply to @rockerest
kenhowardpdx Same - to a stronger degree - with ES6+. ES6 was 2015, should I use ES6+ to refer to ES2016 features (fully standard now)?
-
…in reply to @rockerest
kenhowardpdx Honestly, I think we should *only* have: JavaScript, or ESNext. The former is fully standard features, the latter is proposals