rockerest’s avatarrockerest’s Twitter Archive—№ 19,151

    1. …in reply to @_atjn
      _atjn I agree with the outcome! I don't think I agree that that's desireable! Part of being an engineer - to me - is understanding a platform and working on solutions in those bounds. I don't think the platform should be required to abstract complexities when they're self-imposed.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo rockerest’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite 2022 Mar 11 Mood +3 🙂
  1. …in reply to @rockerest
    _atjn Admittedly, this comes down to "do I think types should be part of the language." My answer is an emphatic "no", so that informs my overall take here. If someone is "yes," they're going to want it in the platform, because they might see it as "missing," not "additive."
    On twitter.com Twitter logo rockerest’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite 2022 Mar 11 Mood -1 🙁
    1. …in reply to @rockerest
      _atjn But this is what you've been saying all along: this ultimately comes down to "do we think types should be in JS."
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo rockerest’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite 2022 Mar 11 Mood 0